Louis Farrakhan's recent video on the Netanyahu fiasco is an interesting example of a complex issue, namely, how someone with very little moral standing in any real sense can be sometimes be prone to a kernel of some kind of insight. Just watch the first few moments.
There are quite a few things to be said about Louis Farrakhan, the leader of The Nation of Islam.
For example, it can be said with very little consternation that Louis Farrakhan was probably the most immediately responsible person for the death of his mentor, Malcolm X. The author and journalist Karl Evanzz has written two substantial books, THE JUDAS FACTOR: THE PLOT TO KILL MALCOLM X and THE MESSENGER: THE RISE AND FALL OF ELIJAH MUHAMMAD, which show that, while there certainly were artificial antagonisms generated between the NOI and Malcolm by the FBI and CIA, who were aiming to neutralize Malcolm's agenda, the person most directly responsible for fostering the notion of Malcolm as a hypocrite was Farrakhan. In the NOI, the word hypocrite was a condemnation that denoted nothing less than a death penalty.
Or it can be easily argued that Farrakhan is a truly ahistorical thinker, prone to a bizarre conspiracy theory surrounding an extra-special roll for Jews in the Triangle Trade. In a letter to the Anti-Defamation League, Farrakhan writes to Abe Foxman the following gem.
We can now present to our people and the world a true, undeniable record of the relationship between Blacks and Jews from their own mouths and pens. These scholars, Rabbis and historians have given to us an undeniable record of Jewish anti-Black behavior, starting with the horror of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, plantation slavery, Jim Crow, sharecropping, the labor movement of the North and South, the unions and the misuse of our people that continues to this very moment.Or how about this breathtaking item?
Minister Farrakhan also stated that Israelis were arrested immediately after the attacks but quickly released and sent to Israel, supporting the conclusion that “Israelis had foreknowledge of the attacks,” and that the attacks allowed the Jewish owner of the World Trade Center to collect billions of dollars in insurance money, because he added in “terrorist” attacks as a part of his policy just a few months before 9/11. Minister Farrakhan further revealed that “we know that many Jews received a text message not to come to work on September 11.” Minister Farrakhan concluded that 9/11 was a “false flag operation” to start a war between the West and the Muslim world.Genius.
It is easy to write plenty about the man formerly known as Minister Louis X, but the best man to deliver it is the late Dr. John Henrik Clarke. For one thing, he knew the story from the beginning. In the early years of his ministry, Clarke's African history and culture exhibits attracted Malcolm's attention and Clarke became a sort of secular advisor. In this capacity, Clarke had an up-close and personal eyewitness perspective to the events that ended with assassination, which Clarke did not absolve Farrakhan of.
There is an underlying reason for this exercise. Louis Farrakhan is a problematic figure, putting it mildly. But the point is that his ability to say things that have some semblance of truth in regards to Israel/Palestine is symptomatic of how low Netanyahu has allowed things to go.
The New York Times today featured a missive about BDS at UCLA and how a young woman named Rachel Beyda went through some sort of exercise where her Jewish identity was considered a point of deliberation. It's difficult to discern whether this was idiocy or stupidity, but it is easy to see that this has generated a flash of writing about anti-Semitism on college campuses and all the rest of the usual.